Protecting Children is Being Used as an Excuse to Legitimize the Insecurity of a Minority of Adults.
It is accepted as a fact beyond discussion that we should keep our children from being exposed to sex. That we should hide the very existence of sex from them until they are at least 18 years of age. Of course, it never works that way in practice. Everybody knows that teenagers know more about sex than their parents.
It makes little sense. If sex were considered normal and healthy, and more importantly, if we as adults felt more comfortable with out own sex lives, there really would be no reason to hide anything from children.
Children should not drive cars. But that does not mean that we hide all references to automobiles from them until they are 16.
I have gradually convinced myself that the argument about protecting children, is really being abused by some adults, to legitimize their own insecurities. The argument is used as an excuse to hide and criminalize everything having to do with sex. Of course, that would include nudity and pornography.
This apparently makes it possible to sidestep the Constitution of the United States of America, and to justify the repression and censorship of adults. There seems to be some confusion. Whereas there is a constitutional right to free speech and free expression, to my knowledge there is no constitutional right to be isolated from the free expression of others.
Enrico, 12/09/98, 02/22/01
© Non-Trivial Creations, 1998-2001
Comments? Remarks? Questions?
E-Mail:
Editor@non-trivial.com (Subject: "Sex")
More Topics |
Non-Trivial.com Home
Index